The stages and bridges of learning: a fresh approach (Jacques Delors)

By focusing its recommendations on the concept of learning
throughout life, the Commission did not intend to convey the idea
that by such a qualitative leap one could avoid reflecting on the
different levels of education. On the contrary, it has set out to
reassert some of the major principles advanced by UNESCO, such as
the vital need for basic education, to urge a review of the role of
secondary education and to examine the issues raised by developments
in higher education, particularly the phenomenon of mass higher
education.
Quite simply, learning throughout life makes it possible to organize
the various stages of education to provide for passage from one stage to
another and to diversify the paths through the system, while enhancing
the value of each. This could be a way of avoiding the invidious choice
between selection by ability, which increases the number of academic
failures and the risks of exclusion, and the same education for all, which
can inhibit talent.
The foregoing in no way detracts from the excellent definition of basic
learning needs produced in 1990 at the World Conference on Education for
All (Jomtien, Thailand):
These needs comprise both essential learning tools (such as literacy, oral expression,
numeracy, and problem solving) and the basic learning content (such as knowledge,
skills, values, and attitudes) required by human beings to be able to survive, to
develop their full capacities, to live and work in dignity, to participate fully in
development, to improve the quality of their lives, to make informed decisions, and
to continue learning. (World Declaration on Education for All, Art. 1, para. 1.)
This is certainly an impressive catalogue, but it does not necessarily imply
an overloading of curricula. The teacher–pupil relationship, the learning
available in children’s local environment, and an effective use of modern
media (where they exist) can in conjunction contribute to the personal
and intellectual development of each pupil. The ‘three Rs’
– reading, writing and arithmetic – are given their full due. The
combination of conventional teaching and out-of-school approaches
should enable children to experience the three dimensions of education
– the ethical and cultural, the scientific and technological, and the
economic and social.
To put it another way, education is also a social experience
through which children learn about themselves, develop interpersonal
skills and acquire basic knowledge and skills. This experience should
begin in early childhood, in different forms depending on the situation,
but always with the involvement of families and local communities.
Two observations which the Commission sees as important should be
added at this stage.
Basic education should be extended, worldwide, to the 900 million
illiterate adults, the 130 million children not enrolled in school, and the
more than 100 million children who drop out prematurely from school.
This vast undertaking is a priority for the technical assistance and
partnership projects carried out as part of international co-operation.
Basic education is of course an issue in all countries, including the
industrialized ones. From this initial stage onwards, educational contents
should be designed to stimulate a love of learning and knowledge and
thus develop the desire and provide the opportunities for learning
t h roughout life.
This brings us to one of the major problem areas in any reform, that of
the policies to be applied to the period of adolescence and youth, between
primary education and work or higher education. To coin a phrase,
secondary schools cut rather a sorry figure in educational thinking. They are
the target of considerable criticism and they provoke a considerable
amount of frustration.
Among the sources of frustration are the increased and increasingly
diversified requirements, leading to rapid growth in enrolments and
overcrowded curricula – whence the familiar problems associated with
mass education, which the less-developed countries cannot easily solve at
either the financial or the organizational level. There is also the distress
felt by school-leavers who face a shortage of opportunities, a distress
increased by an all-or-nothing obsession with getting into higher
education. Mass unemployment in many countries only adds to the
malaise. The Commission stresses its alarm at a trend that is leading, in
both rural and urban areas, in both developing and industrialized
countries, not only to unemployment but also to the under-utilization
of human resources.
The Commission is convinced that the only way out of this
difficult situation is a very broad diversification of the types of study
available. This reflects one of the Commission’s major concerns, which
is to make the most of all forms of talent so as to reduce academic
failure and prevent the far-too-widespread feeling among young people
that they are excluded, left with no prospects.
These various types should include both conventional education,
which focuses more on abstraction and conceptualization, and
approaches that alternate school with work experience in a way that
brings out additional abilities and inclinations. In any event, there should
be bridges between these approaches so that errors – all too frequent – in
the choice of direction can be corrected.
The Commission also believes that the prospect of being able to go back
to education or training would alter the general climate by assuring young
people that their fate is not sealed forever between the ages of 14 and 20.
Higher education should be seen from this same angle.
A first point to remember is that, side by side with universities, there are
other types of higher education institutions in many countries. Some cream
off the most able students while others were set up to provide specifically
targeted, high-quality vocational training, lasting between two and four
years. Such diversification undeniably meets the needs of society and the
economy as manifested both at the national and at the regional levels.
Increasingly stringent selection in order to ease the pressures brought
about by mass higher education in the wealthiest countries is neither
politically nor socially acceptable. One of the main drawbacks of such an
approach is that many young people are shut out from the educational
process before they have been able to obtain a recognized diploma; they
are therefore in the desperate predicament of having obtained neither a
formal qualification nor a training appropriate for the job market.
The evolution of enrolments therefore needs to be managed, but it
can be kept within limits as a result of secondary education reform,
along the broad lines proposed by the Commission.
Universities would contribute to this process by diversifying what
they offer:
• as scientific establishments and centres of learning, from where
students go on to theoretical or applied research or teaching;
• as establishments offering occupational qualifications, combin-ing
high-level knowledge and skills, with courses and content continually
tailored to the needs of the economy;
• as some of the main meeting-places for learning throughout life,
opening their doors to adults who wish either to resume their studies or
to adapt and develop their knowledge or to satisfy their taste for learning
in all areas of cultural life; and
• as leading partners in international co-operation, facilitating exchanges
of teachers and students and ensuring that the best teaching is made
widely available through international professorships.
In this way, universities would transcend what is wrongly held to be the
conflict between the logic of public service and the logic of the job market.
They would also reclaim their intellectual and social vocation as, in a sense,
guarantors of universal values and the cultural heritage. The Commission
sees these as cogent reasons for urging greater university autonomy.
Having formulated these proposals, the Commission emphasizes that
these issues take on a special significance in poor countries, where
universities have a decisive role to play. In developing countries, universities
must learn from their own past and analyse their countries’ difficulties,
engaging in research aimed at finding solutions to the most acute among
them. It is also incumbent on them to propose a renewed vision of
development that will enable their countries to build a genuinely better
future. They must provide the vocational and technological training of the
future leaders and the higher- and middle-level education required if their
countries are to escape from their present treadmills of poverty and
underdevelopment. It is particularly necessary to devise new development
models for regions such as sub-Saharan Africa, as has already been done
for some Eastern Asian countries, on a case-by-case basis.

Iklan

Tinggalkan Balasan

Isikan data di bawah atau klik salah satu ikon untuk log in:

Logo WordPress.com

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Logout / Ubah )

Gambar Twitter

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Facebook

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Logout / Ubah )

Foto Google+

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Logout / Ubah )

Connecting to %s

%d blogger menyukai ini: